It is self-evident that I briefly mention while I am in front of a linguistic reading of some types of compositions in Arabic grammar - something about the historical circle in the second century of the Hijra, regarding grammar in terms of its complexity and codification and the matter of complexity and codification, but I do not see that it is intuitive that I stand long with these The point is especially in front of the specialized readers, for whom this is one of what they know. I say that Al-Khalil bin Ahmed (may God have mercy on him) based the Arabic grammar on two important points, the first of which is the presence of an Arabic grammar in the Arabic language. And the way of change is how to place them on the morphological buildings in the series of sentence systems, so that the strength of feeling that has pushed some Arabic grammarians to the point of saying that it is' the science of putting movements on the last words in the sentences. And the second of it is the explanation of the presence of the syntactic movement in every location in a specific way, a hedge, a hole, or a fragment ... etc.). This is not from the language itself. Rather, it is a philosophical outlook invented by a scientist who has strong insight and depth of insight.