Comment on the ruling on the jurisdictional order regarding the judicial authority and the cancellation of the implementation of General Amnesty Law No. (27) of 2016, second amendment

The decision of the Federal Supreme Court has sparked significant legal controversy across jurisprudence, legislation, and the judiciary. The ruling faced strong opposition from the Supreme Judicial Council, which directed the enforcement of the General Amnesty Law and issued instructions for its implementation, without awaiting the outcome of the cases under review by the Federal Supreme Court. The Council regarded the state order as a temporary measure with limited authority, distinct from judicial rulings that are final, binding, and immune from challenge, where no evidence can be admitted to undermine their validity