This research is a realistic scientific debate that demonstrated the confrontation of groups of people with proof, each according to his mentality. Because returning with proof is more correct than returning with the sword. Because fear may lead its owner to be hypocritical, while the person with proof is not like that. He confirms that the roots of the science of theology, whose goal is to defend the truths of faith in a rational and convincing way, were present in the Qur'an and desirable science, as appeared from the debate of Abraham - peace be upon him.It gives us insight into knowing God without excessive denial or excessive comparison, but rather with a knowledge befitting His majesty that there is nothing like Him. He uses methods of persuasion according to the classes of people, perhaps by stimulating the innate sense without using scientific terminology in reasoning. It may be by using the balance of reason and logic in an easy form, or it may be by using reason in a precise form, which is the path of philosophy or the path of the mysterious and precise rationalist.